US Supreme Court upholds gun ban on home abusers

The US Supreme Court on Friday upheld a federal regulation prohibiting home abusers from possessing a firearm, the most recent authorized ruling within the nation’s fierce battle over gun rights.

It was the primary gun case to return earlier than the court docket — the place conservatives maintain a 6-3 majority — since a significant determination issued in 2022 loosening gun restrictions.

“When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the second amendment,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote within the 8-1 opinion.

“Since the founding, the nation’s firearm laws have included regulations to stop individuals who threaten physical harm to others from misusing firearms. As applied to the facts of this case, (the law) fits comfortably within this tradition,” Roberts stated.

In the 2022 determination, the nation’s highest court docket stated it will authorize solely “reasonable” exceptions to the Second Amendment proper to bear arms and would depend on historic precedents relating to regulating firearms.

That ruling left decrease courts struggling to find out whether or not gun restrictions earlier than them have been per “the history and traditions” of firearms regulation within the United States within the late 18th to the nineteenth century.

An ultraconservative appeals court docket dominated in March {that a} federal regulation banning gun possession by individuals with home violence restraining orders was unconstitutional, for lack of historic precedent.

“A woman who lives in a house with a domestic abuser is five times more likely to be murdered if he has access to a gun,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar stated in November final yr as she made the case for upholding the federal regulation for the Biden administration.

“Congress may disarm those who are not law-abiding, responsible citizens,” she added.

“Throughout our nation’s history, legislatures have disarmed those who have committed serious criminal conduct or whose access to guns poses a danger.”

– ‘Trapped in amber’ –

Related News

She cited minors, people with psychological sickness, felons and drug addicts as amongst these prohibited from possessing firearms.

Indicating his settlement with the federal government’s place, Roberts — one of many bench’s conservatives — wrote that “some courts have misunderstood the methodology of our recent second amendment cases. These precedents were not meant to suggest a law trapped in amber.”

In the case earlier than the court docket, police recovered a handgun and a rifle throughout a search of the Texas residence of Zackey Rahimi, who had been implicated in 5 shootings in two months and was topic to a protecting order on behalf of a former girlfriend which prohibited him from proudly owning weapons.

Rahimi’s lawyer Matthew Wright argued that there was no historic precedent for depriving his consumer of firearms with out there being an precise conviction for a criminal offense.

Dissenting from the court docket’s opinion, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas stated states have already got legal prosecution as a instrument for disarming anybody who makes use of a firearm to threaten bodily violence.

“Most states, including Texas, classify aggravated assault as a felony, punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment… Thus, the question before us is not whether Rahimi and others like him can be disarmed consistent with the second amendment,” Thomas wrote.

“Instead, the question is whether the government can strip the second amendment right of anyone subject to a protective order — even if he has never been accused or convicted of a crime. It cannot.”

Some 100 gun management activists, together with the actress Julianne Moore, carrying indicators studying “Disarm Domestic Abusers” staged an illustration exterior the Supreme Court because the justices heard about 90 minutes of oral arguments final yr.

Senator Amy Klobuchar, who filed a short urging the court docket to uphold the ban, stated in an announcement the justices had protected a “common sense law that has been in place for 30 years.”

“Even with today’s outcome, we know there is more work to be done,” she added.




About Author

You may also like


Protesting Zamfara neighborhood barricades Govt House, faults troops withdrawal

There was tension in Gusau, the Zamfara State capital on Sunday, as residents of Bini village in the Maru Local

How to spice up your checking account, cellular pockets safety

Cybercriminals are constantly devising new ways to exploit vulnerabilities and steal sensitive information. DANIEL ADAJI outlines ways to safeguard your